The Convergence of Biokinetics, Ergonomics and Healthcare Technology

Introduction

Healthcare systems are increasingly being challenged to do more than diagnose and treat disease. They must also help individuals maintain independence, participate in daily life, and achieve meaningful improvements in function. In response, technologies such as wearable devices, virtual reality (VR), simulation and artificial intelligence (AI) are beginning to transform how healthcare is delivered and experienced. These innovations are creating new opportunities for prevention, diagnosis, rehabilitation and long-term health management. However, the value of technology should not be measured solely by its sophistication. Its true value lies in its ability to improve health outcomes, optimise human function and enhance quality of life.

The World Health Organization estimates that approximately 2.4 billion people worldwide live with health conditions that could benefit from rehabilitation. This highlights the growing need for healthcare systems to focus not only on treating disease, but also on preserving, restoring and optimising function. At the same time, healthcare systems face increasing financial, operational and workforce pressures. The challenge is therefore not whether healthcare should adopt technology, but whether that technology creates meaningful value for both individuals and healthcare systems.

Advances in healthcare technology, combined with a growing focus on human function, are creating new opportunities for collaboration between Biokinetics and ergonomics. Biokinetics focuses on improving physical function through evidence-based exercise and rehabilitation. Ergonomics focuses on optimising interactions between individuals, their environments and the systems they use.

Healthcare technology provides tools that support assessment, monitoring, intervention and decision-making. Together, these disciplines can contribute to a more personalised, proactive and human-centred healthcare model.

Human Function as a Healthcare Outcome

Human function is increasingly recognised as one of the most important outcomes in healthcare. While diagnosis and treatment remain essential, they do not always reflect how effectively an individual can perform activities of daily living or maintain independence. Although health conditions differ in their causes and clinical presentation, many have a similar impact on an individual's ability to function effectively in everyday life. This is evident across a broad range of acute and chronic health conditions.

As populations age and chronic conditions become more prevalent, healthcare systems are required to focus not only on managing disease, but also on preserving independence, promoting participation and maintaining quality of life. Biokinetics contributes directly to this objective through exercise-based interventions aimed at improving mobility, strength, balance, cardiovascular health and functional capacity. Whether working with an athlete returning to sport, an individual recovering from cancer treatment, a patient living with diabetes or an older adult seeking to remain independent, the underlying objective remains the same: improving human function.

Function, however, is influenced by more than physical ability alone. An individual may possess the strength and mobility required to perform a task yet still encounter difficulties due to environmental barriers, poorly designed equipment or psychological factors. This broader understanding of function highlights the importance of ergonomics and healthcare technology in modern healthcare.

Ergonomics and Human-Centred Healthcare

Ergonomics is concerned with the interaction between people and the systems around them. These systems include equipment, technology, workplaces, tasks and environments. Its purpose extends beyond comfort, seeking to optimise human wellbeing while improving system performance.

Within healthcare, ergonomics provides a framework for understanding how people interact with the technologies and environments that influence their health and function. A technology may be clinically effective and technically sophisticated, yet still fail if it does not meet the needs of the individual using it. Healthcare technologies should therefore be designed with the user in mind, particularly when intended for populations with reduced physical, sensory or cognitive capacity. Technology should adapt to the individual rather than expecting the individual to adapt to the technology.

This principle becomes increasingly important as healthcare systems adopt digital platforms, wearable devices, telehealth services and AI-supported decision-making tools. The success of these technologies depends not only on technical performance, but also on usability, accessibility and acceptance by both patients and healthcare professionals. By ensuring that technologies are designed around human capabilities and limitations, ergonomics helps transform innovation into practical solutions that support health, function and participation.

Technology and the Measurement of Function

One of the greatest contributions of healthcare technology is its ability to measure function beyond the traditional clinical environment. Historically, healthcare professionals have relied heavily on assessments conducted in clinics, hospitals and rehabilitation facilities. While these assessments remain valuable, they often provide only a snapshot of an individual's performance at a particular moment in time. Wearable technologies, mobile applications and remote monitoring systems allow healthcare professionals to collect information about movement, activity and physiological responses during everyday life. This improves understanding of how individuals function outside structured assessments.

For Biokineticists, this information can provide valuable insights into physical activity levels, movement behaviour, exercise adherence and functional performance. Wearable technologies may reveal important differences between clinical performance and real-world participation, enabling more informed intervention planning. The goal of healthcare is not simply to improve performance during an assessment. It is to improve how individuals function in their homes, workplaces and communities. Technology becomes particularly valuable when it helps bridge the gap between clinical outcomes and everyday participation.

Virtual Reality and Rehabilitation

Virtual reality is one of the most promising examples of technology being used to support human function. VR creates immersive and interactive environments where individuals can practise physical and cognitive tasks while receiving immediate feedback. This makes it particularly relevant to rehabilitation, where repetition, progression and task-specific practice are essential components of recovery.

Research has demonstrated the benefits of VR in areas such as stroke rehabilitation, balance training and motor learning. Beyond its physical benefits, VR may also influence psychological and behavioural outcomes. Human function is strongly influenced by factors such as confidence, fear, anxiety and motivation. Fear of falling, for example, may discourage individuals from engaging in physical activity despite having the physical capacity to do so. Reduced participation can contribute to deconditioning, loss of confidence and further functional decline.

VR may help address these barriers by creating controlled environments in which individuals can safely practise increasingly challenging tasks. Repeated successful experiences may reinforce confidence, reduce fear and encourage greater participation in rehabilitation.

For Biokineticists, VR represents an additional tool for addressing both physical and psychological barriers to recovery. By combining evidence-based exercise interventions with immersive technology, rehabilitation programmes can target not only physical capacity but also the confidence required to apply that capacity in everyday life.

Simulation and Human Performance

Simulation represents another area where healthcare technology can contribute to improved outcomes. Rather than waiting for healthcare professionals to encounter complex situations in practice, simulation allows scenarios to be reproduced in controlled environments. Procedures, emergencies and decision-making processes can be practised repeatedly without exposing patients to unnecessary risk. Simulation is also highly relevant to ergonomics because interactions between people, equipment and environments can be evaluated before changes are implemented. Potential design issues, workflow challenges and human-system interaction problems can be identified before they affect performance or safety.

There is also a financial dimension to simulation. Traditional training often requires physical resources, travel, equipment use and operational expenditure. While simulation requires an initial investment, repeated use may reduce long-term costs while providing opportunities for standardised and repeatable training.

Outside healthcare, simulation has already demonstrated value in sectors such as aviation, military training and driver education, where it reduces reliance on fuel, equipment utilisation and operational resources while maintaining training quality. Similar principles may create opportunities for more efficient healthcare training, equipment evaluation and system design.

The Psychological Dimension of Healthcare Technology

Technology does not operate independently of human behaviour. Patients must understand interventions, recognise their value and remain motivated to participate. Similarly, healthcare professionals must perceive technology as useful and practical if it is to become part of routine practice. Individuals are more likely to engage with technology when it is easy to use, provides meaningful feedback and helps them achieve relevant goals. Technologies that are overly complex or provide little perceived value are less likely to be adopted successfully.

Healthcare technology can support motivation by providing feedback, tracking progress and encouraging patient involvement in the rehabilitation process. Rather than being passive recipients of care, patients can become active participants in their own health management. For Biokineticists, this creates opportunities to support long-term behavioural change, while for ergonomists it reinforces the importance of designing technologies that align with human needs and expectations.

Is Technology Worth the Investment?

Technological innovation inevitably raises questions regarding cost. Advanced equipment, software platforms, infrastructure and training programmes often require substantial investment, particularly within healthcare systems where resources are already constrained. Focusing solely on the initial cost of a technology, however, may provide an incomplete picture. The more important question is whether the technology creates sufficient value over its lifespan.

Remote healthcare services may improve accessibility and reduce travel requirements. Wearable monitoring systems may support earlier identification of functional decline. Simulation may reduce the need for repeated use of physical resources while improving training opportunities. Digital health platforms may extend care beyond traditional healthcare settings. Technology should therefore be evaluated according to its contribution to outcomes, efficiency, accessibility and participation rather than cost alone.

The Future of Human-Centred Healthcare

The future of healthcare will likely involve increasing integration between digital health, wearable technologies, VR, simulation and AI. These technologies have the potential to support earlier identification of functional decline, more personalised rehabilitation programmes and improved monitoring of health outcomes. AI may assist healthcare professionals in identifying patterns within large datasets, while wearable technologies may provide continuous information about movement and activity.

Despite these advances, technology alone cannot improve health outcomes. Future healthcare professionals will still require the clinical judgement necessary to interpret information and apply it appropriately. The future of healthcare should therefore not be defined solely by technological advancement, but by how effectively technology supports human function.

Conclusion

Healthcare technology is creating new opportunities to improve prevention, rehabilitation, monitoring and long-term health management. Yet its success should ultimately be judged by its impact on people.

Human function provides a common objective through which Biokinetics, ergonomics and healthcare technology can converge. Technology provides new tools for assessment, monitoring and intervention. Ergonomics ensures that these technologies are designed around people and their environments. Biokinetics helps translate technological information into meaningful improvements in movement, participation and quality of life.

As healthcare continues to evolve, the most successful innovations will not necessarily be the most advanced. They will be the ones who help individuals function more effectively, maintain independence and participate fully in everyday life. By combining the principles of Biokinetics, ergonomics, and human-centred design, healthcare systems can ensure that innovation remains focused on what matters most: improving human function and quality of life.

References

1. Baker, S.B. and Xiang, W., 2023. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications, opportunities and challenges. Health Information Science and Systems, 11(1), pp.1–12.
2. Biokinetics Association of South Africa (BASA), 2025. What is Biokinetics? Available at: BASA Public Information [Accessed 8 August 2026].
3. Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I.A.C., Raya, M.A. and Riva, G., 2018. The past, present and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, p.2086.
4. Dorsey, E.R. and Topol, E.J., 2020. Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. The Lancet, 395(10227), pp.859–860.
5. Ellapen, T.J., Strydom, G.L., Swanepoel, M., Hammill, H. and Paul, Y., 2018. Biokinetics: A South African Health Profession Evolving from Physical Education and Sport. In: Physical Education and Sport in Health and Disease. London: IntechOpen.
6. Fagher, K., Jacobsson, J., Dahlström, Ö. and Timpka, T., 2020. Wearable technology and digital health in rehabilitation and exercise medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(11), pp.1–8.
7. Glegg, S.M.N. and Levac, D.E., 2018. Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 98(9), pp.737–747.
8. Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), 2026. Professional Board for Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Biokinetics. Available at: HPCSA Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Biokinetics Board [Accessed 8 August 2026].
9. Holden, M.K., 2005. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(3), pp.187–211.
10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2019. ISO 9241-210:2019 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems. Geneva: ISO.
11. Kaplan, R.M., 2016. Quality of life and health outcomes in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(2), pp.189–194.
12. Laver, K., George, S., Thomas, S., Deutsch, J.E. and Crotty, M., 2017. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, CD008349.
13. Meldrum, D., Herdman, S., Vance, R., Murray, D., Malone, K., Duffy, D. and McConn-Walsh, R., 2015. Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation in balance and mobility disorders. Clinical Rehabilitation, 29(8), pp.745–755.
14. Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L. and Rodgers, M., 2012. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 9(21), pp.1–17.
15. Riva, G., Mantovani, F. and Wiederhold, B.K., 2020. Positive technology and the future of healthcare.
16. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(12), pp.761–764.
17. South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA), 2023. Bachelor of Biokinetics Qualification (SAQA ID 97899). Available at: SAQA Qualification Database [Accessed 6 August 2026].
18.  
19. Topol, E.J., 2019. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. New York: Basic Books.
20. World Health Organization (WHO), 2024. Rehabilitation. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: WHO Rehabilitation Fact Sheet [Accessed 12 August 2026].
21. World Health Organization (WHO), 2024. Rehabilitation 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: WHO Rehabilitation 2030 [Accessed 12 August 2026].
22. World Health Organization and Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), 2020. Global Estimates of the Need for Rehabilitation Based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization